Nikon lens options

By: argon 512 days ago
for wildlife fotography ie. action as well as still life in low light conditions, what lenses would give the best results without any or limited correction? a 70-200/f2.8 vr with a tc 1.4 or tc 2.0 teleconverter or a 70-300/4.5-5.6 vr. i would appreciate to have some replies to the pros and cons for both.
By: Hibe 511 days ago
I borrowed my buddy's 70-300mm VR and I really did like it. It seemed really sharp, but it had some focusing issues. The price is good though. Here is one of my favorite shots I took with it http://www.viovio.com/photos/image/755865/22413.

I recently bought a Sigma 150mm-500mm f5-6.3 OS. I have a taste for fast glass, but at over $1,700, I decided to go with more zoom and less f-stop at just under $1,000 rather than the 70-200mm VR you are considering. Here is a sample photo I took with it. http://www.viovio.com/photos/image/960244/19786

I notice a wavy aberation in the OOF backgrounds and sometimes a color aberation around the edges. I'm assuming these are created by the Optical Stabilization. It does focus quickly and smoothly. This lens is so new, I haven't seen any reviews on it yet. (...OOOPS, spoke too soon. There is a review right here on the forum.) I can tell you it is big and heavy. It comes with a soft case and strap which is good because it wont fit in my bag.It uses a 86mm filter. A plain UV filter is cheap enough ($35), but a polorized filter will set you back more than a new 50mm f/1.8 lens. Of course if you're considering the 70-200 VR, the price of a couple of filters won't make you blink.

The VR (or OS for Sigma) will make up for handshake and give you the equivilent of a couple of stops faster, but since you're into nature photography like me, fast glass will give you a better edge on a subject on the move, especially in early morning and evening light when creatures are out, (even though there are VR and OS settings to compensate for subject movement). The 70-200mm VR gives you both and with the teleconverter you can take it to 400mm. Just remember that a 2.0 TC will double your f-stop. So you will essentially have a 140-400mm f/5.6 VR. I'm assuming that the VR function will still work with the TC?

Well that's my 2 cents, but I will tell you to pretty much ignore what I said and check out Ken Rockwell's site for some very insightful reviews on almost every Nikon DSLR and lens made. http://kenrockwell.com/

Add your message

Login required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free.

photodo Stats

1102 lenses
428 MTF tests
74 in-depth        photodo reviews
100+ users join each day

Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search