|
Photodo stats
1102 lenses 428 MTF tests 74 in-depth photodo reviews 100+ users join each day Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search | Canon 135mm F/2 L USMPage 1 of 1: 1 Canon claims this lens as the fastest 135mm prime lens and we can’t find a faster one available. So what use is a fast, short telephoto lens. We take a look.
Build and handling The focus limit switch restricts focusing to 1.6m to infinity from the full 0.9m to infinity and cuts down the short focus time even more. It also helps if you are not doing any close work or are trying to shoot through a fence or the like. The USM motor keeps things nice and quiet as well as quick. Internal operation means the front element does not rotate, another plus point. The focus ring doesn’t rotate during autofocus either, but can be manually over-ridden without switching. So generally, it is a very usable lens. The focal length is at the long end of what is normally recommended for portraiture and with the perspective it gives, this still holds true in the cropped digital age. The wide aperture does mean that this lens can be used in low lighting conditions where others might well struggle. This includes indoor sports in confined conditions as well as Gig and stage photography. Optical Quality Contrast, as is usual, is good and the control of chromatic aberrations is well handled. Sharpness wide open is certainly usable and improves as the lens is stopped down, peaking at around the f/8 mark. Where this lens does score is in the out-of-focus areas, giving a pleasing effect that helps the main subject stand out.
Click on each comparision photo below to view full size versions Below is our lens test data. To find out how to use these graphs look at this article: How we test lenses Verdict In summary the main positive points of the Canon 135mm F/2 L USM are: Negative points are: Check the latest price of the Canon 135mm F/2 L USM here Test performed by Ian Andrews of www.wildaboutkent.co.uk 72 mm IS NOT an "unusual filter size" for Canon users, especially for those particularly interested in "L" lenses.
You made a rigorous test and I don't want to dispute it from a position of an ordinary user. But if I read your graphs correctly, this lens shows MTF50 at about 3.5@f8. If this lens shows significantly worse numbers than a Sigma zoom (70-200/2.8 shows 4.5-5), then I suspect there is something wrong in your tests. Also your finding that Canon 17-40 (approx. 4.5) is better than 35/1.4 (approx 4) contradicts my experience. Yes, our copies may be different, but there also could be a flaw in your methodology. Are the tests done with the same camera? Did you use the same version of the software to evaluate? Is the photographed chart the same?
I have this lens, it was purchased about a year ago, wide open it didn't blow my mind from a standpoint of sharpness. Stopped down to f4 it goes beyond the resolving power of my 12MP 5D. It stays beyond that at every aperture above f4.
I honestly don't understand the conclusions of this review. However there is whispering of late that Canon has had some quality control issues. There may be an unusually large sample variation. I got it and just love it.
But for Digital 1.6x crop size. The image size is seem narrow to shoot more than single or couple people. "Canon claims this lens as the fastest 135mm prime lens and we can’t find a faster one available."
If by fast, you mean bright (widest available aperture) in a 135mm lens, see this Autofocus lens in Maxxum/Dynax/Alpha mount. Sony Carl Zeiss® Sonnar® T* 135mm f/1.8 http://www.photodo.com/product_1127.html Just purchased one a couple of days ago and carried out my own usual series of tests for performance at all apertures. Very simple test, using a full double-page spread of a well known UK daily newspaper taped down firmly onto an art drawing board and photographed using the camera mounted to a good sturdy tripod, using mirror lock and a remote shutter-release cord. Obviously particular care is given to making certain everything is totally parallel and in line. Results? Well, just one simple word defines these - FANTASTIC! Sharpness is amazing even from full aperture with edges and corners following suit on stopping down to f2.8 when it remains in exceptional levels of sharpness until diffraction begins to take it's toll on sharpness, initially corners/edges only at f22 and then in the centre at f32. This lens performs just as amazingly on APS-C sized sensor cameras when it effectively behaves like a 216mm f/2 prime lens (think how much such a full-frame lens would cost?!) and also produces still stunning quality when used with my SIGMA EX DG 1.4x converter, effectively providing a 302mm f/2.8 lens, losing virtually nothing in quality until stopped down to and effective f/32 and f/45 when diffraction spoils things a little. I don't know what other converters are like, except that in a recent magazine comparison test, the SIGMA converters (both 1.4x and 2x) appeared to be significantly better than any of the others tested, including Canon's own! I know that my 1.4x SIGMA converter produces stunning results when used with the Canon 135mm f/2L USM lens. This is more applicable to use on APS-C cameras due to the smaller sensor using the central sweet spot of the image circle. A surprisingly versatile and ultra high quality option for those like me, who work with both FF and APS-C sized sensor cameras. David Chamberlain Page 1 of 1: 1 Add your messageLogin required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free. |