Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS
Sigma 18-200mm Specification
- Lens Name Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS
- Focal length 18-200mm
- Optical Construction: 18-13 elements/groups
- Max Aperture: f/3.5-6.3
- Min Aperture: f/22
- Closest focus: 0.45m
- Filter Thread: 72mm
- Dimensions: 79x100mm
- Weight: 0.61kg
- Mount Sigma, Canon, Nikon(D)
- Price (SRP) £439.99
Sigma 18-200mm Build and Handling
This lens is surprisingly solid in its construction and is heavier again by half than its non-OS sibling. The difference is not just from the OS system though, with a better overall feel to it that encourages confidence in its abilities. Not that the lens is heavy, but it is certainly no plastic fantastic!
Two substantial, rubber embossed rings, one to operate the zoom and the other for manual focussing adorn the majority of the barrel. Both are nicely torqued with the focussing ring being the lighter of the two to use when in manual mode. Two control switches adorn the left of the barrel (Canon and Sigma fit) one for the AF on/off and the other for the OS on/off. Both are sturdy and have well protected collars. A smaller zoom lock switch also sits just to the left of centre. The zoom action extends the barrel by some 60mm on a double trombone that has virtually no play in it. The first of the trombone sections is helpfully marked with a reproduction ratio that goes to a maximum of 1:3.9.
Another good point is that the front element does not rotate during use, a boon to those using effect and Grad filters.
The lens is only the second in Sigma’s line-up that offers their Optical Stabilisation (OS) system and, unusually, Sigma make no claims as to how much advantage it will give. When pushed, they say it is good for two stops, however, we found this to be a very conservative estimate and managed four stops on a regular basis. The system also automatically detects panning movements, compensating for just the one plane when necessary. The lens comes supplied with protective caps and a bespoke lens hood as standard.
Focus speed is reasonable for the type, with a relatively quiet motor that gets there without much delay. The lack of an HSM motor will be an annoyance to some Nikon owners, but it is highly likely that an HSM version in Nikon fit will be produced in the near future.
Sigma 18-200mm Optical Quality
The problem with superzooms is compromise. Getting the best results from what is a stretching of optical laws to the extremes. At a zoom ratio of 11.1:1, this 18-200mm optic is a result of some well-balanced compromises though. As is usual in this type of lens, the wide end is better than the longer end in general, but does suffer some distortion. Barrel distortion is just evident at the wide end of the zoom, turning to negligible pincushion by the time the telephoto end is reached.
The lens benefits from stopping down throughout the zoom range with peak performance being reached between f/8 at the shorter lengths while it improves still further to f/11 and beyond at the longer focal lengths. It is usable throughout the range though.
Chromatic aberrations have been fairly well sorted too, with evidence at the edges improving to the state where they are not visible once a couple of stops down.
Generally, for the type of lens, it is not a bad performer.
|Sigma 18-200mm OS 18mm at f/8||Sigma 18-200mm OS 200mm at f/8|
|Sigma 18-200mm OS 18mm at f/3.5||Sigma 18-200mm OS 200mm at f/6.3|
|Images shot at 63mm and 200mm respectively, showing versatility of superzooms|
|Shot hand held at 200mm with a shutter speed of 1/13th second shows the effectiveness of the Sigma OS system|
Sigma 18-200mm Verdict
Sigma must be congratulated for being the only independent to offer in-lens stabilisation and in this case, one that really works. It is not really required at the short end of the range but does become very handy as the focal length increases. With commendable optical performance for its type, the lens is well worth consideration.
In summary, the positive points of the Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS are:
Good stabilisation system
Good build quality
Decent optical performance for type
The negative points are:
Heavier than some
Some CA around the edges at wider apertures
Barrel distortion at the wide end.
The Sigma 18-200mm OS costs from £440 and is available at the ePHOTOzine shop here
So I bought it a bout a couple of months a go in Japan when it just out and I was disappointed with all photos I shot with it.
I returned and bought a D80 for with the Nikon's famous 18-200VR for walk around and travel light solution.
Well, how can I say, the Nikon is so nice and cool while this Sigma is ?
I think if you need an ultra zoom , get the Nikon with a Nikon body , this Sigma is nothing like the Nikon, focuses slow , not sharp , not really well designed.
Also, the Sigma AF at least my 2 copies were so capricious at best.
I think this lens also is too heavy for what it is, it is heavier than my Canon EF-S17-55 f2.8 IS or 24-105f4L IS, both of them are pro quality lenses not cheap travel lenses.
However all the weaknesses that others mention I could blame the camera for, I have a Canon EOS 350. I tried the Nikon D80 and this was significantly better in my opinion than my camera or the majority of cannon offerings in this price range. I also tried it with the Sigma lense on and they worked well together and this suggests that this is a very good lense for the money.
When will Cannon make a camera as good as the nikon??
Printing Service | Online Print Shop Management System
Albuquerque Product Photography Atlanta Product Photography Austin Product Photography Baltimore Product Photography Boston Product Photography Charlotte Product Photography Chicago Product Photography Cleveland Product Photography Columbus Product Photography Dallas Product Photography Denver Product Photography Detroit Product Photography Houston Product Photography Indianapolis Product Photography Jacksonville Product Photography Kansas City Product Photography Las Vegas Product Photography Los Angeles Product Photography Louisville Product Photography Memphis Product Photography Miami Product Photography Milwaukee Product Photography Minneapolis Product Photography Nashville Product Photography New Orleans Product Photography New York Product Photography Oakland Product Photography Oklahoma City Product Photography Philadelphia Product Photography Phoenix Product Photography Pittsburgh Product Photography Portland Product Photography Sacramento Product Photography San Antonio Product Photography San Diego Product Photography San Francisco Product Photography San Jose Product Photography Seattle Product Photography Washington Product Photography Calgary Product Photography Edmonton Product Photography Montreal Product Photography Ottawa Product Photography Quebec Product Photography Regina Product Photography Saskatoon Product Photography Toronto Product Photography Vancouver Product Photography Winnipeg Product Photography
Custom Sticker Printing | Sticker Printing companies
Albuquerque Printing Company Arizona Printing Company Atlanta Printing Company Austin Printing Company Baltimore Printing Company Boston Printing Company Charlotte Printing Company Chicago Printing Company Cleveland Printing Company Colorado Printing Company Columbus Printing Company Dallas Printing Company Denver Printing Company Detroit Printing Company Houston Printing Company Indianapolis Printing Company Jacksonville Printing Company Kansas City Printing Company Las Vegas Printing Company Los Angeles Printing Company Louisville Printing Company Memphis Printing Company Miami Printing Company Milwaukee Printing Company Minneapolis Printing Company Nashville Printing Company New Orleans Printing Company New York Printing Company Oakland Printing Company Oklahoma City Printing Company Philadelphia Printing Company Phoenix Printing Company Pittsburgh Printing Company Portland Printing Company Sacramento Printing Company San Antonio Printing Company San Diego Printing Company San Francisco Printing Company San Jose Printing Company Seattle Printing Company Washington Printing Company Toronto Printing Company Vancouver Printing Company Calgary Printing Company Edmonton Printing Company Winnipeg Printing Company Ottawa Printing Company Montreal Printing Company Quebec Printing Company St John's Printing Company Saskatoon Printing Company Regina Printing Company
Albuquerque Sticker Printing Arizona Sticker Printing Atlanta Sticker Printing Austin Sticker Printing Baltimore Sticker Printing Boston Sticker Printing Charlotte Sticker Printing Chicago Sticker Printing Cleveland Sticker Printing Colorado Sticker Printing Columbus Sticker Printing Dallas Sticker Printing Denver Sticker Printing Detroit Sticker Printing Houston Sticker Printing Indianapolis Sticker Printing Jacksonville Sticker Printing Kansas City Sticker Printing Las Vegas Sticker Printing Los Angeles Sticker Printing Louisville Sticker Printing Memphis Sticker Printing Miami Sticker Printing Milwaukee Sticker Printing Minneapolis Sticker Printing Nashville Sticker Printing New Orleans Sticker Printing New York Sticker Printing Oakland Sticker Printing Oklahoma City Sticker Printing Philadelphia Sticker Printing Phoenix Sticker Printing Pittsburgh Sticker Printing Portland Sticker Printing Sacramento Sticker Printing San Antonio Sticker Printing San Diego Sticker Printing San Francisco Sticker Printing San Jose Sticker Printing Seattle Sticker Printing Washington Sticker Printing Toronto Sticker Printing Vancouver Sticker Printing Calgary Sticker Printing Edmonton Sticker Printing Winnipeg Sticker Printing Ottawa Sticker Printing Montreal Sticker Printing Quebec Sticker Printing St John's Sticker Printing Saskatoon Sticker Printing Regina Sticker Printing
Albuquerque Sticker Arizona Sticker Atlanta Sticker Austin Sticker Baltimore sticker Boston sticker Charlotte sticker Chicago sticker Cleveland sticker Colorado sticker Columbus sticker Dallas sticker Denver sticker Detroit sticker Houston sticker Indianapolis sticker Jacksonville sticker Kansas City sticker Las Vegas sticker Los Angeles sticker Louisville sticker Memphis sticker Miami sticker Milwaukee sticker Minneapolis sticker Nashville sticker New Orleans sticker New York sticker Oakland sticker Oklahoma City sticker Philadelphia sticker Phoenix sticker Pittsburgh sticker Portland sticker Sacramento sticker San Antonio sticker San Diego sticker San Francisco sticker San Jose sticker Seattle sticker Washington sticker Toronto sticker Vancouver sticker Calgary sticker Edmonton sticker Winnipeg sticker Ottawa sticker Montreal sticker Quebec sticker St John's sticker Saskatoon sticker Regina sticker
Toronto Printing Vancouver Printing Calgary Printing Edmonton Printing Winnipeg Printing Ottawa Printing Montreal Printing Quebec Printing Saskatoon Printing Regina Printing
Albuquerque Sticker Arizona Sticker Atlanta Sticker Austin Sticker Baltimore sticker Boston sticker Charlotte sticker Chicago sticker Cleveland sticker Colorado sticker Columbus sticker Dallas sticker Denver sticker Detroit sticker Houston sticker Indianapolis sticker Jacksonville sticker Kansas City sticker Las Vegas sticker Los Angeles sticker Louisville sticker Memphis sticker Miami sticker Milwaukee sticker Minneapolis sticker Nashville sticker New Orleans sticker New York sticker Oakland sticker Oklahoma City sticker Philadelphia sticker Phoenix sticker Pittsburgh sticker Portland sticker Sacramento sticker San Antonio sticker San Diego sticker San Francisco sticker San Jose sticker Seattle sticker Washington sticker
Print Trade | Print Wholesale | Print Outsource
Add your message
428 MTF tests
74 in-depth photodo reviews
100+ users join each day
Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search
- Fujifilm XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM Lens Review
- Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens Review
- Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.4 DC Macro Lens Review
- Tokina AT-X 11-16mm T3 CINE Lens Review
- Tokina Cinema AT-X 16-28mm T/3 Lens Review
- Pentax DA* 60-250mm f/4 ED [IF] SDM Lens Review
- Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8 ED [IF] SDM Review
- Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 Review
- Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4 SL II Lens Review
- Voigtlander 40mm f/2 Ultron SL II Review