|
Photodo stats
1102 lenses 428 MTF tests 74 in-depth photodo reviews 100+ users join each day Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search | Tokina AT-X DX 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 FisheyePage 1 of 1: 1 Tokina, like Nikon, use the DX prefix for lenses designed purely for APS-C sized or ‘cropped’ sensors. With a field of view of 180° at the wide end on these sensors, we take a look at how this lens performs.
Build and handling The first of the two rings operates the zoom mechanism and is marked at 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17mm and is well torqued, giving a feeling of solidity to the zoom mechanism. The front of the lens sports a fixed hood with no filter thread and the lens cap is a nice fit over the wings of the hood. The zoom action is at it’s shortest physical length at the 12mm mark but extends the front of the lens only marginally as you zoom to the two extremes of the focal length. There is, however, no method of using filters and with the 180° field of view at the widest, no point in trying to attach any. Optical quality Resolution at the centre of the frame is quite good and peaks with the lens stopped down just a notch with chromatic aberrations surprisingly well controlled across the full extent of the frame. Performance is best at the shorter focal length but the drop in resolution is minimal as the focal length increases. Flare, which is often a bugbear with this type of optic, is well controlled and ghosting is almost impossible to induce, a good omen. Click on each comparision photo below to view full size versions Below is our lens test data. To find out how to use these graphs look at this article: How we test lenses
Verdict In summary, the positive points of the Tokina AT-X DX 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 lens are: The negative points are:: Check the latest price of the Tokina AT-X DX 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 lens here Discuss this lens and other related lens subjects here Test by Ian Andrews www.wildaboutkent.com Ian wrote in the conclusion of his review that this zoom lens has no manual over-ride of AF.
This is definitely not the case for the Canon mount lens: I use it every day for panography: http://michel.thoby.free.fr/Tokina_10_17/Intricate_Panography.html AFAIK Nikon have fitted their DSLR camera with a switch on the body to over-ride the AF. So, why would this be a negative point not to have it on the lens? Michel In the context written, the lens has no over-ride without switching. Lenses with sonic drive motors can be over-ridden without recourse to switches either on the lens or the system body.
The difference is that by moving the focus on a non-over-ridable lens such as this, is that you are moving the working parts of the AF motor at the same time. HIH Ian It would be nice to see the close focusing capability of this lens further discussed here. I don't own it, but being a Pentax owner, I do have interest in the Pentax version. And the close focused image samples I've seen certainly add to the uniqueness of this lens. By the way, Herbert Keppler wrote about this fish-eye twice last year, with a particular comment about its close focusing. http://keppler.popphoto.com/blog/2006/08/slr_worldclass_.html http://keppler.popphoto.com/blog/2006/12/inside_straight.html Cheers, Page 1 of 1: 1 Add your messageLogin required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free. |