|
Photodo stats
1102 lenses 428 MTF tests 74 in-depth photodo reviews 100+ users join each day Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DCPage 1 of 1: 1
Specification
Controls on the lens are simple, consisting of a switch on the left side for AF/MF (except Nikon) and a focus ring. Between the body and the focus ring is a distance window, but, surprisingly, no depth-of-field scale. The focus ring is well torqued and there is no difference in this torque whichever mode it is used in. The HSM motor, which is both quiet and responsive, allows manual override of the focus in AF mode. As for how responsive, the autofocus was almost instant and as quiet as any lens I have used. Optical performance The lens has been optimised to work at a single focal length and it has been done well. CA (Chromatic aberration) has been eliminated to all intent and purpose. Shooting against a clear sky and blowing up to 400% showed no evidence of any fringing from f/2 onwards. Contrast is good and colour balance excellent. Only slightly softer at f/1.4, the lens was still usable at this extreme aperture. With modern, high ISO digital cameras, this lens is the one for shots of the proverbial ‘Black Cat in a Coal Cellar’!
Below is our lens test data. To find out how to use this graph look at this article: How we test lenses
Verdict In summary the main positive points of the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC are: Negative points are: Test by Ian Andrews www.wildaboutkent.co.uk The maritime museum shot really looks much softer than the MTF graph would indicate to me. You have it resolving as highly as the Canon 70-200mm f2.8... I am genuinely not seeing this at all. It looks soft at the center of the frame and blurry in the corners.
Maybe it's just me but there seem to be a lot of screwy results on this website. It looks to me like the maritime photo just has a major case of camera shake. The letter on the sign seem to have distinct "ghost images" rather than lack of resolution. The shot of the harbour, on the other hand, looks pretty damn sharp to me.
I bought this lens for 4/3 standard (Olympus E-500) two months ago. I am really satisfied, this lens is well suited for making photos in bad light conditions without flash. The pictures are little softer than by use of Zuiko 14-54/F2.8-3.5 lens, but nice. The work with DoF is perfect. Good parameters & price, perfect choce as a alternative to zoom lenses. RR
The photos here are not as crisp as I know this lens can produce. If you look at the sign next to the white door, letters are not sharp. This does no justice to this lens at all!
Amazing that some of you compare this lens to zoom lenses. It outperforms any of the Nikkor zoom lenses I have by far. The sharpness in the center is just as good as the “old fashioned standard” Nikkor 1.8/50 I used on F5. Like that lens, this 1.4/30 is much better than any of the zooms in the corners, both on resolution and chromatic aberration. Also there is very little distortion, which is visible only when you make photos of long straight lines like in architecture. There is only a small problem with auto focus in the worst of lighting conditions, but manual focus under those circumstances work better anyway. I have used this fast Sigma lens and was so disappointed I returned it after two weeks of shooting. The main issue was sharpness, to the eye, on a computer monitor. This was just an impression at first, but was bourne out in casual comparisons to my f/2.8 zoom at about 30mm. A shame. Is it possible that the individual lenses vary enough to account for such a range of impressions? Anyway, just wanted to throw that in. I didn't think the HSM focussing on a D40 was anything special either, and ended up manual focussing in many cases. Cheers. Page 1 of 1: 1 Add your messageLogin required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free. |