|
Photodo stats
1102 lenses 428 MTF tests 74 in-depth photodo reviews 100+ users join each day Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX HSMPage 1 of 1: 1
Specifications
Build and Handling The weight and feel of the lens is pleasing as it is slightly lighter than it’s predecessor and sports the matt textured EX finish. Already mounted on the lens is the removable tripod collar with a good-sized released knob. This is Sigma’s quick release type with the hinge and pull knob that can be removed without dismounting the lens from the camera. The collar has two white lines marked on it to indicate horizontal (landscape) and vertical (portrait) orientations. It is easier by far to turn the lens and camera combination in this collar than to contort the tripod head off centre to achieve a portrait style shot. The collar is well placed at the balance point with a camera fitted. The lens has Sigma’s HSM (HyperSonic Motor) focussing system that is not only relatively quiet in operation but allows manual over-ride without turning the autofocus off. The internal mechanisms of the focus and the zoom systems on this lens means that it stays at a constant length at all settings. Polarising filters are easy to use, as the front element does not rotate during operation. The zoom ring has a grippy surface and is smooth in operation without being too stiff. Markings indicating the focal length occur at 70, 85, 100, 135 and 200mm. The distance window, situated between the two adjustment rings, gave a good indication of the focus distance and was also marked with a standard depth of field scale for the wide end at f/11, f/16 and f/22. Marks for f/22 at the tele end are also given. On all but the Nikon mount version, a switch of the push-pull variety for the auto/manual focus change is situated on the left side of the lens near he mount to the camera. Optical performance At the 70mm end the lens performed best at around the f/8 mark before starting on the downward slope towards reciprocity, whereas at 135mm and above it continued to improve to between f/11 and f/16 before peaking. The lens performed slightly better at the 70mm end of the zoom range than at the 200mm end, but was still sharp enough at the long end for all practical purposes. Chromatic aberration is very well controlled throughout the entire zoom range and the worst case I could find was near the edge of the frame at f/22 with the lens fully extended and that was still well below the threshold where it would become apparent to the naked eye. I would rate the colour rendition and contrast of this lens as good, with the colour being neutral rather than cold or warm. Contrast was maintained throughout the range, even wide open.
Click on each comparision photo below to view full size versions
Below is our lens test data. To find out how to use these graphs look at this article: How we test lenses
Optional Converter With the lens fitted to the 1.4x EX the lens becomes a 98-280mm f/4 fully autofocusing zoom and with the 2x EX converter it transforms to a 140-400mm f/5.6 autofocus, both of which are still relatively small in size and retain the non-extending/rotating advantages of the mother lens. The autofocus speed is virtually unaffected with the 1.4 EX fitted, although it slows and hunts a little more with the 2x EX in the light path. Verdict In summary the main positive points of the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX HSM are: Negative points are: Check the latest price of the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX HSM here Test by Ian Andrews www.wildaboutkent.co.uk Hi,
The sample photo of the maritime museum (70-200mm at 200mm and f/2.8) seems a little blurry throughout the frame... do you know if the shot was out of focus slightly, or is this the degree of sharpness I can expect from this lens when used at 200mm / f2.8? Cheers, Alan I see CA in two of the shots, wide open at 70mm and in the bottom right segment of the clock tower shot at f8.
I also notice that wide open this lens is extremely soft even at 70mm in the center of the frame. It is clearly MUCH MUCH softer than the Canon 70-200mm shots you have posted on this very website. Please tell me what the shit is you are smoking because your results ARE FUCKED THE HELL UP!!! Hey mayaman, comments like "Please tell me what the shit is you are smoking because your results ARE FUCKED THE HELL UP!!!" are not necessary and unwanted, chill dude
This is an OUTSTANDING lens. The proof is in the results.
http://www.emergencyphoto.com Highly recommend this one! Mayaman - can't express your feelings another way? Constructive critique is much better ! Page 1 of 1: 1 Add your messageLogin required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free. |