|
Photodo stats
1102 lenses 428 MTF tests 74 in-depth photodo reviews 100+ users join each day Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search | Sigma 100-300mm f/4 EX DGPage 1 of 1: 1 Here is a lens from Sigma that fits into the medium to long telephoto range and is a step up from the average 70-300mm models. It sports a constant aperture of f/4 and Sigma’s HSM autofocus motor. We take a look at how it performs.
Build and handling Autofocus is achieved with HSM, Sigma’s hypersonic system that is both quick and virtually silent in operation. The lens stays the same length throughout both focussing and zooming, and without the front element rotating, making life for filter users easy with the 82mm filter thread. Also supplied with the lens is a front lens hood that is more or less a bucket shape with the slight exception of a small cut-out to stop vignetting at the wider setting. The hood is a nice, snap bayonet, fitting that stays in place during use. The lens is also compatible with Sigma’s EX Teleconverters and retains autofocus when used with the 1.4X version. Optical quality The new digital coating Sigma have applied to all of their lenses, to cut out light reflected back from digital sensors bouncing around inside the lens, has had the added benefit of improving contrast and the same is true of this optic. Resolution is pleasing and the performance in this department is very close across the frame with very little drop-off towards the edges. A bonus for users of full frame equipment. The one area where there is a slight disappointment is in the control of Chromatic Aberrations (CA). There is no evidence anywhere in the range at the centre of the frame; however, at the longer focal length the anomaly does start to creep in at the very edges. Most of the time, and under a lot of circumstances, it would not be noticed, but it is there.
Click on each comparision photo below to view full size versions Below is our lens test data. To find out how to use these graphs look at this article: How we test lenses
Verdict In summary, the positive points of the Sigma 100-300mm f/4 EX DG are: The negative points are: Check the latest price of the Sigma 100-300mm f/4 EX DG here Discuss this lens and other related lens subjects here Test by Ian Andrews www.wildaboutkent.com I'm curious about the test of Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX DG. The photos of the clocktower are allright, but the photos of the stonewall are rather unsharp and blurry. How come? Ater all this is a rather sharp lens as i've learned from reading different tests, and studying a large numbers of photos taken with this lens. It even looks good with 1x4TC, so i'm a bit confused why the stonevall is so unsharp. I'm planning to buy a Canon 400D (Xti) and this is one of the lenses i've been looking at. It's rather expensive so i dont want to be dissappointed. If anyone could answer this to me i would be wery happy. My english is not at top so i hope you'll disregard from my grammar.
I too think there are problems with sample photos here. I've this lens and it's really great, never so unsharp. If you look well the 300f8 sample is the same photo that's in the sigma 28-300 review too...
Thank you stefanOn for your observations and for your reply.It's good to hear from someone that owns this lens how it really works.I mean ,it's rather expensive and i dont want to be disappointed.
I bought the Sigma 100-300 f/4 and have found it to be a very sharp lens. I too was first concerned about sharpness because of this one review and that 300mm soft image, but all other reviews, forums and personal image websites convinced me that this lens is worth owning because most image examples were very sharp and detailed images. I have wildlife shots now that amaze me because of the image detail. Very highly recommended lens.
Strange, but the 300mm shot of the clock tower is the exact same shot as you have on the cheaper Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 review located at http://www.photodo.com/topic_224.html.
This lens is exceptional in my estimation for a 3rd party optic. The lens I have (non-DG) I bought used from Bill Booz (Bill Booz Photography) when he decided to replace it with an "L" lens. If you check his website all of the shots on there were done with the Sigma prior to his getting the Canon lens last year. From that no one should have any doubt about the quality of the photos this lens can produce. Page 1 of 1: 1 Add your messageLogin required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free. |