|
Photodo stats
1102 lenses 428 MTF tests 74 in-depth photodo reviews 100+ users join each day Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L ISPage 1 of 1: 1
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS specifications
Build and Handling Going away from the camera body you first come to the tripod collar. In front of that is the zoom ring marked at 70, 100, 135 and 200mm. It's smooth in operation and neither too loose nor too tight to turn. This ring has a double patterned grip in rubberised material that does not slip in the fingers, even when damp. Next comes the distance window that is practical but basic, lacking any attempt at a depth-of-field scale. Around the left of the barrel at this point are the focus and IS (Image Stabilisation) controls. Top is the focus limiter, a two position flush switch that limits the focus to 1.4m to infinity or 2.5m to infinity. Below this is a proud two-position switch to change from Manual to Autofocus. Next down is the on/off switch for the IS system, another proud switch and finally a fourth switch, flush this time, that controls the IS mode, the choices being 1 & 2. The next and last ring forward is the manual focus ring, again rubberised, this time with a triple pattern as a tactile difference to the zoom ring. It does seem a pity that manufacturers cannot keep these tactile patterns the same throughout their lens ranges. The focus ring is as smooth in operation as the zoom. The whole lens is well enough made for Canon to claim it is dust and splash proof and, along with our lovely British weather, I managed to test these claims out in a couple of heavy downpours and a trip out to the Seal sandbanks in the Thames Estuary without any problems. My one concern about the build of this lens, and it is one I am beginning to notice time and again, is the inability to remove the tripod mount ring without removing the lens from the camera. With concerns of dust entering the camera through the lens mount with modern dSLRs, the ability to remove the mount ring, for example when using a beanbag, without removing the lens from the camera would be an advantage. This one requires removing the lens, then lining up the red dots, a two handed job, before slipping it off over the lens mount. To achieve that, the camera needs to be put down or left swinging from a neck strap. Performance Canon's Image stabilisation (IS) system, now in its second generation, does what it says on the tin and helps enormously when trying to hand hold a lens still. Canon claim up to three stops, and I won’t argue with that. You have to flick the switch from mode 1 to mode 2 for panning shots, which, once you spot a moving target, is easily forgotten, but if you are looking for or expecting them, is also very useful. Although this lens uses second generation IS, which should work on a tripod without feedback, I got inconsistant results. It's not as bad as the Sigma OS system, which produces horrific results on tripod, but the Canon is still inconsistant. So I'd recommend turning off IS when the lens is tripod mounted as I still feel the two systems will fight each other with unpredictable results! Optical quality
Click on each comparision photo below to view full size versions Below is our lens test data. To find out how to use these graphs look at this article: How we test lenses
Verdict In summary the main positive points of the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS are: Negative points are: Check the latest price of the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS here Test by Ian Andrews www.wildaboutkent.co.uk fgjhfghj
I have an idea for buying a canon 70-200 lens,which one is the best result,more colour contrast,sharp,70-200is or 70-200 usm pls give me a answer thank you regards prashanth Page 1 of 1: 1 Add your messageLogin required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free. |